Introduction

Organ transplantation emerged as a critical intervention for patients suffering from end-stage organ failure, offering them a renewed chance at life. However, the disparity between the demand for and supply of organs posed a significant challenge, both globally and within India. With a population exceeding 1.4 billion, India faced an overwhelming task in addressing the needs of patients awaiting organ transplants. The situation was particularly dire, as thousands of individuals died each year while waiting for suitable organs.

In this context, the Gujarat model of deceased organ donation, spearheaded by the State Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (SOTTO), stood out as a beacon of hope. Established in 2019, SOTTO Gujarat implemented a series of innovative strategies that significantly improved the rates of deceased organ donation in the state. The Institute of Kidney Disease and Research Centre (IKDRC) in Ahmadabad played a pivotal role in these efforts, contributing to the state's success in organ transplantation.

Data from Gujarat indicated a remarkable increase in the number of deceased kidney and liver transplants over the years. For instance, the number of deceased kidney transplants rose from 103 in 2016 to 252 in 2022, while deceased liver transplants increased from 59 to 186 during the same period. This exponential growth highlighted the effectiveness of the strategies employed by SOTTO Gujarat and the collaborative efforts of various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, government agencies, and community organizations.

The success of Gujarat's programme was not merely a result of improved medical practices; it was also deeply rooted in proactive government involvement, comprehensive counseling for families, and robust public awareness initiatives. By fostering a culture of organ donation and addressing the barriers that previously hindered progress, Gujarat emerged as a leader in the field of organ transplantation in India.

This study aimed to explore the salient features of Gujarat's deceased organ donation programme, examining the factors that contributed to its success, the challenges faced, and the lessons that could be drawn for national implementation. By analyzing the operational framework, community engagement, and institutional support, this study sought to provide a comprehensive understanding of how Gujarat positioned itself as a model for organ transplantation in India.

Key Features of the Gujarat Deceased Organ Donation Model

The Gujarat model of deceased organ donation has emerged as a leading example in India, showcasing a range of effective strategies and practices that have significantly improved organ transplantation rates in the state. Several key features contributed to the success of this model, each playing a vital role in enhancing the overall framework for organ donation and transplantation.

Proactive Government Involvement

One of the most notable aspects of the Gujarat model was the proactive involvement of the state government. The establishment of the State Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (SOTTO) in 2019 marked a significant step in organizing and promoting deceased organ donation efforts. The government actively supported the initiative by facilitating collaboration between public and private hospitals, ensuring that both sectors shared the responsibility of organ retrieval and transplantation. This collaborative approach fostered public trust in government hospitals, which were perceived as more accessible and reliable for organ donation.

Comprehensive Counseling and Family Engagement

A cornerstone of the Gujarat model was the emphasis on comprehensive counseling and engagement with the families of potential organ donors. Trained transplant coordinators played a crucial role in this process, providing empathetic support to families during their time of grief. They utilized audiovisual aids to explain the concept of brain death and the organ donation process, ensuring that family members were well-informed and comfortable with their decisions. This structured approach to counseling led to higher rates of consent for organ donation, as families felt supported and understood throughout the decision-making process.

Strong Institutional Support

The success of the deceased organ donation programme in Gujarat was also attributed to robust institutional support. SOTTO Gujarat established a framework that included dedicated transplant coordinators in hospitals, streamlining the organ retrieval process. These coordinators were responsible for identifying potential donors and ensuring that the necessary protocols were followed. The use of technology, such as WhatsApp groups for quick communication among medical staff, enhanced coordination and responsiveness, allowing for timely interventions when potential donors were identified.

Public Awareness Initiatives

Public awareness campaigns were instrumental in changing perceptions about organ donation in Gujarat. The involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), media, and community leaders helped disseminate positive messages about organ donation, reducing stigma and misconceptions. Events such as marathons, educational seminars, and media campaigns raised awareness and encouraged community participation in organ donation initiatives. The recognition of donor families through public ceremonies further contributed to a culture of organ donation, fostering a sense of pride and community involvement.

Effective Collaboration with Law Enforcement

The Gujarat model also benefited from effective collaboration with law enforcement agencies, particularly in facilitating the transport of organs. The establishment of green corridors for organ transport ensured that organs could be retrieved and delivered to transplant centers swiftly, minimizing the time between retrieval and transplantation. This logistical support was crucial in preserving organ viability and maximizing the number of successful transplants.

Continuous Training and Capacity Building

Continuous training and capacity building for healthcare professionals were integral to the success of the Gujarat model. Regular training programmes for transplant coordinators, ICU staff, and medical personnel ensured that they were well-versed in the latest protocols for identifying potential donors and managing the organ donation process. This emphasis on education and training fostered a culture of readiness and responsiveness within hospitals, ultimately leading to improved outcomes in organ donation and transplantation.

Literature Review

Organ transplantation is a critical medical intervention for patients with end-stage organ failure, yet the disparity between the demand for and supply of organs remains a pressing issue globally, particularly in India. Kute et al., (2021) highlighted that India has one of the lowest rates of deceased organ donation in the world, with figures around 0.67 per million population in 2022, compared to over 20 per million in many European countries. This alarming statistic underscores the urgent need for effective strategies to enhance organ donation rates.

Several barriers hinder the progress of deceased organ donation in India, which can be categorized into individual, institutional, and policy levels. At the individual level, Panwar et al., (2016) conducted a study at AIIMS New Delhi, revealing that only 70% of respondents were aware that organs could be donated, and even fewer understood the concept of brain death. Furthermore, Vijayalakshmi et al., (2016) noted that individual beliefs, including religious concerns and fears about body mutilation, often prevent families from consenting to organ donation.

Institutional barriers also play a significant role in limiting deceased organ donation. Karunakaran, (2018) emphasized that the biggest challenge is not obtaining consent but actively seeking potential donors in critical care settings, as many healthcare professionals lack adequate training in identifying potential organ donors and the complexities involved in brain death certification. Additionally, logistical issues related to organ retrieval and transportation often hinder the process, as highlighted by Shroff and Gill, (2021).

At the policy level, Kute et al., (2020) pointed out that the lack of comprehensive public awareness campaigns and insufficient support for families of donors are significant obstacles. The absence of a centralized organ registry and standardized protocols for organ allocation further complicates the situation. The Transplantation of Human Organs Act of 1994 was a landmark piece of legislation aimed at regulating organ donation and transplantation; however, it was not accompanied by government-funded initiatives to promote deceased donor programmes, resulting in a predominance of living donations.

Despite these challenges, some states in India have made significant strides in deceased organ donation. Saxena et al., (2023) noted that Gujarat has emerged as a leader in this area, with its State Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (SOTTO) implementing effective strategies that have led to a substantial increase in organ donation rates. The proactive approach of government hospitals in Gujarat, combined with community engagement and awareness initiatives, has resulted in a notable rise in deceased organ donations.

Research indicates that the success of organ donation programmes often hinges on the presence of dedicated transplant coordinators. Fernández-Alonso et al. (2021) emphasized that these coordinators facilitate communication between healthcare providers and the families of potential donors, playing a crucial role in counseling families, addressing their concerns, and guiding them through the donation process. The use of audiovisual aids during counseling sessions has also been identified as an effective method for improving understanding and acceptance of organ donation, as noted by Wojda et al., (2017).

Public awareness campaigns have proven to be instrumental in increasing organ donation rates. Alghamdi et al., (2023) found that community engagement, including educational programmes and outreach initiatives, significantly enhances public knowledge and willingness to donate organs. In Gujarat, the involvement of local leaders, NGOs, and media has fostered a positive sentiment towards organ donation, encouraging more families to consider donation during times of grief, as highlighted by Saxena et al., (2023).

Despite the growing body of literature on organ donation in India, significant research gaps persisted, particularly regarding the specific factors that contributed to the success of deceased organ donation programmes at the state level. Most existing studies tended to generalize findings across broader populations without focusing on localized interventions and their outcomes. Additionally, there was a lack of empirical evidence examining the institutional and policy-level factors that facilitated or hindered organ donation. This study addressed these gaps by concentrating on the Gujarat model, which demonstrated notable success in increasing deceased organ donation rates. By analyzing the roles of transplant coordinators, healthcare professionals, and government policies, as well as employing a comparative analysis of data from distinct time periods, this research provided valuable insights and best practices that can be replicated in other regions of India to enhance organ donation efforts.

Objectives of the Study

The primary objective of this study was to examine the factors contributing to the success of the deceased organ donation programme in Gujarat, focusing on the strategies implemented by the State Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (SOTTO). Specifically, the study aimed to analyze the increase in deceased organ donation rates, identify enabling factors such as the roles of transplant coordinators and healthcare professionals, evaluate the effectiveness of community engagement and public awareness campaigns, and provide actionable recommendations that can be replicated in other regions of India to enhance organ donation efforts.

To achieve the objectives outlined above, the following research questions were formulated:

1. How the Deceased organ retrieval and transplantation in Gujarat has undergone a change from 2016 to 2022?

2. What are the factors responsible for improvement in Deceased organ transplantation in Gujarat?

3. What are the enabling factors at Policy and Institutional level in SOTTO Gujarat which can be applied nationally to promote Deceased Organ Donation?

Methodology

This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. Quantitative data on deceased organ donation rates in Gujarat from 2016 to 2022 were collected from the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) and SOTTO Gujarat to assess trends and changes over time. Qualitative data were gathered through structured interviews with key stakeholders, including transplant coordinators and healthcare providers, using a semi-structured questionnaire to explore their experiences and perceptions. The quantitative data were analyzed statistically, while qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing the success of the organ donation programme. 

Findings

Quantitative Data

Table 1: Deceased Organ Transplants in Gujarat (2016-2022)

The data presented in Table 1 reveals significant trends in deceased organ transplants in Gujarat from 2016 to 2022. Initially, the number of deceased kidney and liver transplants fluctuated, with a total of 162 transplants in 2016, peaking at 169 in 2017 before declining to 153 in 2018. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is evident in 2020, where total transplants dropped to 86 due to healthcare disruptions. A recovery occurred in 2021, with total transplants rising to 144, but the most remarkable growth was observed in 2022, when total deceased organ transplants surged to 438. This increase highlights the effectiveness of Gujarat's organ donation initiatives, particularly in 2022, when deceased kidney transplants rose significantly, and liver transplants also saw a substantial increase compared to the previous year. Overall, the data underscores the potential for successful organ donation programmes when supported by proactive policies and community engagement.

Table 2: Comparison of Deceased Transplantation in Gujarat vs. All India (2016-18 & 2020-22)

This table provides a comparative analysis of deceased organ transplantation rates in Gujarat versus all India for the periods 2016-2018 and 2020-2022. In the earlier period, Gujarat accounted for 29.16% of total kidney transplants, significantly higher than the national average of 16.16%. For liver transplants, Gujarat's contribution was even more pronounced at 88.26% compared to 34.35% nationally. In the later period (2020-2022), while the percentage of deceased kidney transplants in Gujarat decreased to 22.04%, it still outperformed the national average of 10.20%. The deceased liver transplant percentage in Gujarat also remained high at 65.59%, compared to 17.67% nationally. This data highlights Gujarat's leading role in organ transplantation in India.

Qualitative Data Analysis

The study highlighted several key themes regarding the factors contributing to the success of the deceased organ donation programme in Gujarat:

1. Proactive Government Support: The establishment of SOTTO Gujarat and the active involvement of the state government were pivotal in promoting organ donation. The government facilitated collaboration between public and private hospitals, ensuring a shared responsibility for organ retrieval and transplantation.

2. Enhanced CounselingPractices: Transplant coordinators were found to be well-trained in providing empathetic support to families of potential donors. The use of audiovisual aids during counselingsessions helped families understand the concept of brain death and the organ donation process, leading to higher consent rates.

3. Public Awareness Campaigns: The involvement of NGOs, media, and community leaders in public awareness initiatives played a crucial role in changing perceptions about organ donation. Events such as marathons and educational seminars helped disseminate positive messages, reducing stigma and misconceptions surrounding organ donation.

4. Strong Institutional Framework: The presence of dedicated transplant coordinators in hospitals streamlined the organ retrieval process. These coordinators were responsible for identifying potential donors and ensuring that necessary protocols were followed, enhancing the overall efficiency of the programme.

5. Collaboration with Law Enforcement: Effective collaboration with law enforcement agencies facilitated the establishment of green corridors for organ transport, ensuring timely retrieval and delivery of organs. This logistical support was essential in preserving organ viability and maximizing successful transplant outcomes.

6. Continuous Training and Capacity Building: Ongoing training programmes for healthcare professionals, particularly in ICUs, ensured that staff were well-versed in identifying potential organ donors and managing the organ donation process. This emphasis on education fostered a culture of readiness and responsiveness within hospitals.

7. Challenges Identified: Despite the successes, challenges such as the identification of potential donors, emotional barriers faced by families, and logistical issues related to organ transport were noted. Addressing these challenges through targeted interventions and continued collaboration among stakeholders was deemed essential for further enhancing the deceased organ donation programme.

Recommendations

Based on the findings from the study of Gujarat's deceased organ donation programme, several recommendations have been identified to enhance the effectiveness of organ transplantation efforts across India. These recommendations are presented below:

1. Enhancement of Proactive Government Support

Continued support from the government for the deceased organ donation programme should be prioritized. Reinforcement of policies that promote collaboration between public and private hospitals is essential to ensure a unified approach to organ retrieval and transplantation.

2. Standardization of Counseling Practices

Comprehensive training programmes for transplant coordinators should be implemented to ensure that structured counseling practices are uniformly adopted across all hospitals. This will facilitate better communication with families of potential donors and improve consent rates.

3. Expansion of Public Awareness Campaigns

Increased efforts should be made to enhance public awareness regarding organ donation. Community engagement initiatives, including educational seminars and media campaigns, should be promoted to dispel myths and misconceptions surrounding organ donation.

4. Strengthening of Institutional Frameworks

The establishment of dedicated transplant coordinators in all hospitals should be mandated to streamline the organ retrieval process. This will ensure that potential donors are identified promptly and that necessary protocols are followed effectively.

5. Formalization of Collaboration with Law Enforcement

Collaboration with law enforcement agencies should be formalized to facilitate the establishment of green corridors for organ transport. This will ensure timely retrieval and delivery of organs, preserving their viability for transplantation.

6. Prioritization of Continuous Training and Capacity Building

Ongoing training programmes for healthcare professionals should be established to enhance their ability to identify potential organ donors and manage the organ donation process. This will foster a culture of readiness and responsiveness within hospitals.

7. Addressing Challenges in Donor Identification

Targeted interventions should be developed to address the challenges related to the identification of potential organ donors. Implementation of protocols for regular training and sensitization of ICU staff regarding brain death identification is recommended.

8. Provision of Emotional Support for Families

Resources should be allocated to ensure that families of potential donors receive adequate emotional support during the decision-making process. This may involve the provision of grief counseling services and the availability of trained professionals to assist families.

9. Mitigation of Logistical Challenges

Clear protocols for organ transport and retrieval should be established to address logistical challenges. This will ensure that organs are transported efficiently and effectively, minimizing delays in the transplantation process.

10. Sharing of Best Practices Nationally

The successful strategies and practices implemented in Gujarat should be documented and shared with other states in India. This will provide a framework for enhancing organ donation programmes nationwide and contribute to the overall improvement of organ transplantation efforts in the country.

Conclusion

The study of Gujarat's deceased organ donation programme has illuminated the significant strides made in addressing the critical issue of organ transplantation in India. Through a combination of proactive government support, enhanced counseling practices, robust public awareness initiatives, and strong institutional frameworks, Gujarat has emerged as a model for effective organ donation. The remarkable increase in deceased organ transplants from 2016 to 2022 underscores the potential for success when comprehensive strategies are implemented.

Despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing barriers related to donor identification and emotional acceptance, the findings indicate that targeted interventions can lead to substantial improvements in organ donation rates. The collaborative efforts of healthcare professionals, government agencies, and community organizations have played a pivotal role in fostering a culture of organ donation, ultimately saving lives and providing hope to countless patients in need.

As India continues to grapple with the growing demand for organ transplants, the lessons learned from Gujarat's experience can serve as a guiding framework for other states. By adopting best practices, enhancing public awareness, and ensuring the availability of resources and training, the goal of achieving organ sufficiency can become a reality. The commitment to improving organ donation and transplantation efforts will not only benefit individual patients but will also contribute to the overall health and well-being of society.

In conclusion, the journey towards a more effective organ donation system in India is ongoing, and the success of Gujarat's programme offers a beacon of hope. With continued dedication and collaboration among all stakeholders, the vision of a future where every patient in need of an organ transplant receives timely and appropriate care can be realized.

References

1. Adithyan, G. S., & Mariappan, M. (2017). Factors that determine deceased organ transplantation in India. Indian Journal of Transplantation, 11(2), 26-30.

2. Alghamdi, A., Alsaleh, A. A., Alfozan, O. A., Qutob, R., Alaryni, A., Bukhari, A., Hakami, O. A., Alhusaini, B. A., Alzmamy, S. A., Alhudayris, F. S., Alshuaibi, L. K., Alenazi, A. M., Alhosaini, L. S., Aljarba, N. K., & AlShammari, S. H. (2023). Awareness, attitude, and beliefs regarding organ donation among the general public in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of General Medicine, 16, 4973–4989. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S434589

3. Chandrasekaran, S., Chandrasekaran, V. P., Nandi, D., Setty, R. S., Srinivasan, O., & Kaur, K. N. (2023). Assessment of awareness level regarding organ donation among healthcare professionals and students in India. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine: Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 27(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24387

4. Cowie, S., Choy, S. H., Shah, D. M., Gomez, M. P., Yoong, B. K., & Koong, J. K. (2023). Healthcare system impact on deceased organ donation and transplantation: A comparison between the top 10 organ donor countries with 4 countries in Southeast Asia. Transplant International: Official Journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 36, 11233. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2023.11233

5. Dhanwate, A. D. (2014). Brainstem death: A comprehensive review in Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine: Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 18(9), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.140151

6. Fernández-Alonso, V., Palacios-Ceña, D., Silva-Martín, C., & García-Pozo, A. (2021). Deceased donor care provided by the nurse transplant coordinator: A qualitative research study among Spanish nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 27, e12905. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12905

7. Fakhr Yasseri, A. M., Namdari, F., Gooran, S., et al. (2021). Living versus deceased kidney transplantation: Comparison of complications. Urologia Journal, 88(3), 185-189. doi:10.1177/0391560321993540

8. Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. (2020). 

http://www.transplant-observatory.org Accessed 1 September 2023.

9. Goila, A. K., & Pawar, M. (2009). The diagnosis of brain death. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine: Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 13(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.53108

10. Janahi, F. K., Al Rais, A., Al Rukhaimi, M., Khamis, A. H., & Hickey, D. (2018). Public awareness of knowledge, belief, and attitude regarding organ donation and organ transplantation: A national survey from the United Arab Emirates. Transplantation Proceedings, 50(10), 2932–2938. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.006

11. Karunakaran, C. E., & Amalorpavanathan, J. (2018). Hospital awareness rather than public awareness is key to promote organ donation. National Medical Journal of India, 31, 193-195.

12. Kumar, V., Yadav, A. K., Sethi, J., Ghosh, A., Sahay, M., Prasad, N., Varughese, S., Parameswaran, S., Gopalakrishnan, N., Kaur, P., Modi, G. K., Kamboj, K., Kundu, M., Sood, V., Inamdar, N., Jaryal, A., Vikrant, S., Nayak, S., Singh, S., Gang, S., ... Jha, V. (2021). The Indian Chronic Kidney Disease (ICKD) study: Baseline characteristics. Clinical Kidney Journal, 15(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab149

13. Kute, V. B., Patel, H. V., Modi, P. R., Rizvi, S. J., Shah, P. R., Engineer, D. P., Banerjee, S., Butala, B. P., Gandhi, S., & Mishra, V. V. (2020). Two decades of deceased donor kidney transplantation at Ahmedabad, India. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation: Official Journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation, 18(5), 549–556.

14. Kute, V. B., Ramesh, V., & Rela, M. (2021). On the way to self-sufficiency: Improving deceased organ donation in India. Transplantation, 105(8), 1625–1630.

15. Kute, V., Ramesh, V., Shroff, S., Guleria, S., & Prakash, J. (2020). Deceased-donor organ transplantation in India: Current status, challenges, and solutions. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation: Official Journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation, 18(Suppl 2), 31–42.

16. Miller, C., & Breakwell, R. (2018). What factors influence a family's decision to agree to organ donation? A critical literature review. London Journal of Primary Care, 10(4), 103–107.

17. Mondal, D., Das, K., & Chowdhury, A. (2022). Epidemiology of liver diseases in India. Clinical Liver Disease, 19(3), 114–117. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.1177

18. National Organ & Tissue Transplant Organisation (NOTTO). National Organ Transplant Programme guidelines. 

https://notto.gov.in/WriteReadData/Portal/News/772_1_final_BOOK.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2024.

19. Panwar, R., Pal, S., Dash, N. R., Sahni, P., Vij, A., & Misra, M. C. (2016). Why are we poor organ donors: A survey focusing on attitudes of the lay public from Northern India. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 6(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2016.04.001

20. Patel, A. H., Balwani, M., Patel, H., Pasari, A., Patel, U., Tolani, P., & Kute, V. (2018). Deceased organ donation in India – Current challenges and scenario. Indian Journal of Transplantation, 12, 174. 

https://doi.org/10.4103/ijot.ijot_26_18.

21. Sachdeva, S. (2017). Organ donation in India: Scarcity in abundance. Indian Journal of Public Health, 61(4), 299–301.

22. Saxena, D., Trivedi, P., Bhavsar, P., Memon, F., Thaker, A., Chaudhary, C., Yasobant, S., Singhal, D., & Zodpey, S. (2023). Challenges and motivators to organ donation: A qualitative exploratory study in Gujarat, India. International Journal of General Medicine, 16, 151–159.

23. Shroff, S., & Gill, J. (2021). Bold policy changes are needed to meet the need for organ transplantation in India. American Journal of Transplantation, 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16537