Abstract

The case explores the strategic dilemma faced by Aadit Palicha, co-founder and CEO of Zepto, India’s fastest-growing quick-commerce startup, in early 2025. After achieving a $5.5 billion valuation and doubling revenue to ₹4,454 crore in FY24, Zepto remained unprofitable, grappling with high operational costs and investor pressure to define a clear exit strategy. Founded in 2021 by Stanford dropouts Palicha and Kaivalya Vohra, Zepto revolutionised India’s grocery market with its 10-minute delivery model powered by hyperlocal dark stores and AI-driven logistics. Despite rapid growth and a 29 % market share, the company faced stiff competition from Blinkit (46 %) and Swiggy Instamart (25 %). As investor sentiment shifted from growth to profitability, Palicha needed to decide whether Zepto should pursue an IPO, raise another venture capital round, merge with a strategic player, or pivot its business model. The case situates this decision within India’s $6 billion quick-commerce industry, projected to reach $20 billion by 2030, yet challenged by thin margins, high cash burn, and uncertain unit economics. It invites students to evaluate the sustainability of Zepto’s growth strategy, assess the trade-offs among financing and exit options, and design a profitability pathway for a company that has redefined consumer convenience but must now prove its financial resilience.

Keywords: Quick Commerce; Startup Strategy; Exit Strategy; IPO Decision; Venture Capital; Mergers and Acquisitions; Market Leadership; Strategic Finance.

Introduction

On a crisp January morning in 2025, Aadit Palicha, a 22-year-old co-founder and CEO of Zepto, was taking stock of his company’s financials in a Mumbai office. The company had surpassed $5 billion valuations by the end of 2024 and was backed by marquee investors (Raghunathan 2024). Zepto continues to lead the race among quick commerce startups in India. Even after doubling revenue to ₹4454 crores for FY24, the company remained unprofitable with a net loss of ₹1249 crores [Exhibit 1]. Investors were now beginning to apply pressure regarding a plausible exit plan. Would Zepto go straight for an IPO in a year or look for more venture capital funding, resort to a business model change, or strategically get acquired? All options were equally attractive and risky, and either way could potentially change the course of the company (Raghunathan 2024).

Founded in 2021, Zepto had disrupted India’s grocery delivery market with its ultra-fast, 10-minute delivery promise. The company rapidly expanded. Securing a major 29% market share, trailing only Blinkit. However, the growth of the quick commerce industry was stunted due to the rising operational costs, low margins, and a change in investor focus towards profitability (Nextsprints Team 2024). Palicha was posed with an important question, what was the ideal exit strategy for Zepto, considering the current state of market?

Company Overview

In early 2021, two Stanford dropouts, Aadit Palicha and Kaivalya Vohra, returned to India amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and saw an opportunity in the growing demand for instant grocery delivery. Traditional e-commerce grocery models took hours, if not days, to fulfill orders, leaving urban consumers frustrated. Recognising this gap, they launched Zepto, a company built on the promise of 10-minute grocery deliveries (“Zepto Success Story – Delivering Groceries in 10 Mins” 2022). The startup’s business model revolved around dark stores, small fulfillment centers located in high-demand areas that allowed it to fulfill orders with optimised delivery routes rapidly. Zepto quickly gained traction, targeting time-sensitive urban consumers, particularly among young professionals and students in India’s metro cities (CLSA 2024).

Zepto’s rapid execution and high consumer adoption made it one of the fastest-growing startups in India. Within a few months of launch, the company raised $60 million in a Series A round, setting the stage for aggressive expansion. As Zepto continued to scale, it attracted significant investor interest due to its high-frequency transaction model, strong retention rates, and potential to dominate India’s nascent quick-commerce sector (Inc42 2025). In 2022, the company secured a $360 million Series C round, led by marquee investors like Y Combinator, Nexus Venture Partners, and Glade Brook Capital, which pushed its valuation to nearly $900 million, just shy of unicorn status [Exhibit 2 and 3]. This rapid increase in valuation within a year reflected investor confidence in Zepto’s ability to disrupt the traditional grocery market and build a highly scalable last-mile logistics infrastructure. The fresh funding allowed Zepto to aggressively expand its operations, reaching multiple cities, including Mumbai, Bengaluru, Delhi, Chennai, Pune, and Hyderabad, and growing its network of over 200 dark stores (“Majority of Zepto’s Dark Stores Operationally Profitable Now: Co-Founder” 2023). Despite the high cost of expansion and operational challenges, the company was proving that quick commerce could be a viable business model in India, attracting more institutional capital and setting the stage for even larger funding rounds in the years to come (Nextsprints Team 2024).

By FY23, Zepto’s revenue surged to ₹2,024 crore, a significant leap from ₹142 crore in FY22. However, this aggressive growth came at a steep cost, as the company reported a net loss of ₹1,272 crore due to high operational expenses, last-mile logistics, and heavy discounting to acquire customers (Business Standard 2023). The increasing demand and investor optimism led to another $200 million Series D funding round in August 2023, which pushed Zepto’s valuation to $1.2 billion, officially making it a unicorn (Business Standard 2023).

The real breakthrough came in 2024, when Zepto managed to raise a massive $665 million funding round at a staggering $5.5 billion valuation, making it the most valuable quick-commerce startup in India (“Wikipedia: Zepto” 2025). This funding allowed Zepto to deepen its presence in major metros, optimise its supply chain, and expand product offerings beyond groceries into personal care, household essentials, and snacks (The Economic Times 2025). By this time, Zepto had achieved a 29% market share, making it the second-largest player in India’s quick-commerce industry, trailing only Blinkit (46%) but ahead of Swiggy Instamart (25%) (Inc42 2025). Its FY24 revenue more than doubled to ₹4,454 crore, while net losses slightly narrowed to ₹1,249 crore, suggesting that the company was slowly improving its unit economics (Moneycontrol 2024).

One of Zepto’s biggest milestones was achieving EBITDA positivity in nearly 75% of its dark stores, proving that the model could be sustainable at a micro level (Nextsprints Team 2024). However, despite these positive signals, the company still faced significant challenges. Quick commerce remained a high-cash-burn, low-margin business, and Zepto’s long-term viability depended on how effectively it could balance growth with profitability (Financial Times 2025). Unlike traditional e-commerce giants that had diversified revenue streams, Zepto’s model was built on frequent, low-ticket transactions, making profitability even harder to achieve at scale (Moneycontrol 2024).

As investors grew wary of loss-making startups, Zepto faced mounting pressure to chart a clear path to profitability (TVS Capital Fund 2025). The question of whether to go public or seek additional private funding became a pressing issue. Some investors believed that an IPO could provide the liquidity needed for expansion, while others feared that public markets would penalise a company that was still unprofitable (Moneycontrol 2024). Another possibility was a strategic acquisition, with rumors that Swiggy, Amazon, or even a private equity firm could step in to acquire Zepto and integrate it into their larger ecosystems.

As 2024 progressed, Zepto found itself at a crossroads. It had established itself as a dominant force in the quick-commerce sector, but the path ahead was far from straightforward (Reuters/AICPDF 2025). With cash burn still a concern and competition intensifying, the company had to decide whether to continue scaling aggressively, shift toward a profitability-first approach, or explore strategic partnerships or an exit (Moneycontrol 2024). What had started as an ambitious idea between two young entrepreneurs had now turned into one of the most closely watched startups in India, and its next move would define whether it could become a sustainable long-term player or fall victim to the pitfalls of hyper-growth businesses (TVS Capital Fund 2025).

Industry Overview

The Indian quick-commerce sector has been witnessing an exponential growth from 2021 and has transformed the delivery business of grocery and day-to-day items through ultra-fast service fulfillment methods (India Retailing 2024). Originally a niche sector, it soon snowballed into a mainstream concept because urban customers embraced the delivery of groceries in 10 to 30 minutes (Nextsprints Team 2024). Quick-commerce platforms use dark stores, which are strategically located small warehouses filled with high demand items, to achieve quick deliveries (The Economic Times 2025). This system bypasses traditional retail’s limitations, enabling businesses to aggressively expand in metropolitan regions (Nextsprints Team 2024).

India’s quick-commerce market was valued at $6 billion in 2024 in revenue terms, having doubled from $3.5 billion in 2023. Industry projections estimate that it will reach $20 billion by 2030, driven by urbanisation, rising disposable incomes, and an increasing preference for convenience [Exhibit 4].

The number of quick commerce users in India has grown exponentially since 2017, reaching 26.2 million in 2024 and projected to hit 60.6 million by 2029. The increasing shift in consumer behavior, with urbanisation, a need for convenience, and online shopping, are the possible reasons for this growth trajectory. The sharp rise between 2022 and 2025 suggests that the market is in a rapid expansion phase, with more players entering the space and consumers getting accustomed to instant deliveries [Exhibit 5].

The average revenue per user (ARPU) in India’s quick commerce sector has shown a steady upward trajectory, growing from $78.57 in 2017 to $127.68 in 2024, with projections of $164.08 by 2029. This indicates that not only is the user base expanding, but consumers are also spending more on quick commerce platforms. The increasing ARPU suggests potential for profitability in the long term, provided companies optimise operational costs and enhance customer retention [Exhibit 6 to 11].

However, despite rapid adoption, the industry faces challenges such as high operational costs, razor-thin margins, and investor scrutiny over profitability (Financial Times 2025). Unlike food delivery, which benefits from repeat high-value orders, quick-commerce transactions are typically lower in value, making cost efficiency critical (TVS Capital Fund 2025). The industry is currently dominated by three major players—Blinkit, Zepto, and Swiggy Instamart—each with unique strategies and competitive advantages (Inc42 2025).

Other Key Players and Market Share

Blinkit (46% Market Share – Industry Leader, Backed by Zomato)

Originally launched as Grofers in 2013, Blinkit pivoted to the quick-commerce model in 2021 to compete with emerging startups in the space. This transition proved successful, positioning Blinkit as the market leader with a 46% share in 2024 (“Blinkit” 2023). Blinkit’s biggest advantage is its strategic acquisition by Zomato, which invested heavily in expanding its dark store network, integrating grocery services into its food delivery platform, and leveraging its strong brand presence. With Zomato’s deep pockets, Blinkit has been able to subsidise delivery costs, expand into tier-2 cities, and strengthen unit economics faster than its competitors (The Economic Times 2025).

Blinkit’s growth has been fuelled by aggressive expansion and deep discounting, but profitability remains a challenge. While Zomato’s backing has helped secure funding and sustain operations, the company has faced criticism for low-margin transactions and high customer acquisition costs. In 2024, Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal emphasised a focus on profitability, signalling a shift from growth at any cost. Blinkit has since experimented with subscription models, premium product listings, and expanding into adjacent categories like electronics and cosmetics to improve margins. With the backing of a publicly traded parent company, Blinkit has a relatively stronger position compared to standalone startups like Zepto. However, its future will depend on whether it can achieve long-term profitability before investor patience runs out.

Swiggy Instamart (25% Market Share – Leveraging Swiggy’s Ecosystem)

Swiggy Instamart, launched in 2020, operates as Swiggy’s quick-commerce division, leveraging the company’s vast food delivery infrastructure to serve grocery and daily essential needs (“Swiggy” 2020). With a 25% market share, Swiggy Instamart is the third-largest player in the sector, trailing Blinkit and Zepto. Unlike Zepto, Swiggy Instamart benefits from Swiggy’s existing customer base, allowing for cross-selling and reduced customer acquisition costs (Inc42 2025).

Swiggy Instamart has strategically positioned itself as a premium quick-commerce service, focusing on high-quality groceries, fresh produce, and premium packaged goods. Unlike Blinkit and Zepto, which focus on ultra-fast deliveries, Swiggy Instamart has a slightly more flexible delivery time window (15-30 minutes), allowing for better order bundling and higher average order values. This approach has helped Swiggy optimise costs and reduce per-order losses (“The Story Behind Swiggy” n.d.).

However, Swiggy’s long-term commitment to Instamart remains uncertain. The company has struggled with balancing its core food delivery business with the capital-intensive quick-commerce model. In 2023, Swiggy reportedly considered spinning off Instamart into a separate entity to attract independent investors, similar to how Zomato structured Blinkit. If funding challenges persist, Swiggy may either reduce its focus on Instamart or seek a strategic partner to sustain its quick-commerce operations.

BigBasket – A Traditional E-Grocery Giant Adapting to Quick Commerce

BigBasket, a pioneer in India’s online grocery segment, was founded in 2011 and gained significant market dominance by offering a wide range of groceries, fresh produce, and household essentials with next-day or scheduled deliveries. In 2021, Tata Digital acquired a majority stake in BigBasket, strengthening its financial backing and operational capabilities. Unlike pure-play quick commerce players like Zepto and Blinkit, BigBasket initially focused on a high-inventory, warehouse-driven model with a strong emphasis on customer trust and quality (“BigBasket” 2023).

However, to keep up with the shift toward instant grocery delivery, BigBasket launched BB Now, its quick commerce service, in 2022. BB Now follows the dark store model, enabling deliveries in under 20 minutes in key metropolitan cities. Unlike Zepto and Blinkit, which rely heavily on VC funding, BigBasket benefits from Tata Group’s deep pockets, allowing it to expand without excessive external fundraising. The company also leverages its existing supply chain and warehousing infrastructure, giving it an operational edge in inventory management and cost control.

Despite its advantages, BigBasket faces challenges in competing with aggressive discounting strategies by Zepto and Blinkit. While Tata’s backing ensures financial stability, the company must balance unit economics, customer acquisition costs, and operational efficiency to sustain itself in the quick commerce space. Whether BB Now can scale successfully without burning excessive cash remains a key question.

The Dilemma

As Aadit Palicha, co-founder and CEO, sat in his Mumbai office, he faced the biggest decision of his career. Zepto’s cash burn was high, and investors were growing impatient. The company needed to chart a clear exit strategy—but which path was the right one? Should Zepto pursue an IPO, secure additional VC funding, explore a merger/acquisition, or pivot its business model?

1. Pursuing an IPO (Initial Public Offering)

The advantage of an IPO is that it could help Zepto raise billions in funding, which could be used to expand operations, improve efficiency, or even acquire smaller competitors. It would also give Zepto a stronger brand reputation, making it a more recognised company in the business world. However, going public comes with risks. Stock market investors expect profitability, or at least a clear roadmap to achieving it. Zepto is currently losing money, and public investors may not be comfortable investing in a company that is still burning cash (Moneycontrol 2024).

Moreover, once Zepto goes public, it would be required to disclose its financials every quarter, meaning greater scrutiny from investors, analysts, and the media. If the company fails to meet growth expectations, its stock price could fall, reducing investor confidence and making future fundraising even harder. The biggest challenge is whether Zepto, which is still in the early stages of profitability, is ready for such pressure. Many startups that go public too soon struggle to maintain investor trust, and their stock prices fall significantly.

2. Raising Additional VC (Venture Capital) Funding

On the other hand, raising another round of VC funding would allow Zepto to continue expanding without worrying about immediate profitability. This means it could invest in technology, operations, and customer acquisition, ensuring that it captures more market share before competitors grow stronger. Additionally, private investors do not require quarterly financial reports, which gives Zepto more flexibility to experiment and improve its business without constant public scrutiny (TVS Capital Fund 2025)

However, securing more VC funding is becoming increasingly difficult. Many investors have become cautious about quick-commerce startups due to their high cash burn and uncertain profitability. If Zepto fails to show a clear path to making money, existing investors may refuse to invest more, or they may demand stricter terms, such as higher ownership stakes (which means Aadit and his team would have less control over the company).

3. Merging with or Being Acquired by a Bigger Company

Instead of continuing independently, Zepto could sell itself to a larger company or merge with a strategic partner. This means joining forces with a well-established company that has deep pockets and can help Zepto achieve stability. Some potential buyers could be:

Reliance Retail – One of India’s largest retail giants, which is rapidly expanding into online grocery delivery. Reliance could use Zepto’s technology and customer base to strengthen its position in quick commerce.

Tata Group (BigBasket) – Tata owns BigBasket, a leading online grocery platform. If Tata acquires Zepto, it could integrate Zepto’s fast delivery model with BigBasket’s existing customer base.

Amazon India – Amazon is already a big player in e-commerce but has struggled in grocery deliveries. Acquiring Zepto could give Amazon an edge in India’s hyperlocal delivery market.

The biggest advantage of an acquisition is that Zepto would get access to the resources, infrastructure, and customer base of a big player, which could reduce its financial struggles. The company could focus on efficiency instead of burning cash on expansion.

However, selling to a bigger company comes with trade-offs. First, Zepto’s founders and early investors might lose control over decision-making. The acquiring company might change Zepto’s brand, leadership, or strategy, which means Aadit and his team may no longer be able to run Zepto the way they originally intended. Secondly, large corporations often prioritize profits over innovation, so Zepto’s original vision of 10-minute deliveries might be compromised.

Additionally, if Zepto sells too early, it might not get the best valuation. If the company continues growing independently for a few more years, it could be worth much more in the future. The decision to sell must be weighed against the potential future growth of the company.

Conclusion

Finally, could Zepto rethink its model—perhaps shifting from a discount-driven growth strategy to a more sustainable profitability-focused approach? Palicha knew that time was running out. Delay the decision, and Zepto risked falling further behind Blinkit, which had already established itself as the market leader. Move too quickly, and the company could take a misstep that it might never recover from. Every scenario had risks, and there was no perfect answer. But a decision had to be made—one that would not only shape Zepto’s future but also determine whether India’s quick-commerce revolution would be remembered as a fleeting trend or a lasting transformation in consumer behavior (TVS Capital Fund 2025). As he weighed his choices, one question loomed large in his mind: What should Zepto’s next move be?

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 5

Exhibit 6

Exhibit 7

References

1. “BigBasket.” 2023. Wikipedia. Last modified February 14, 2023. https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/BigBasket.

2. “Blinkit.” 2023. Wikipedia. Last modified November 22, 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Blinkit.

3. Business Standard. 2023. FY23 Losses Widen 3x: FY23 Revenue ₹2,024 Crore (+14x), Losses ₹1,272 Crore, Expenses ₹3,350 Crore; Cost per Rupee Earned ₹1.7; Series-E $200 Million at $1.4 Billion Valuation. October 26, 2023.

4. CLSA. 2024. App-racadabra Research Report: Zepto ~28% Market Share vs Blinkit’s 39%;~400 Dark Stores + 30+ Hubs; Cost per Order Dropped: Long-haul (₹1.7 → ₹0.8), Handling (–9%), Last-mile (–20%); Zepto Café Rising from 5% to 8% of Spend; Ad Revenues ≈₹3–4 Billion; Zepto Pass Gained 4 Million. 2024.

5. The Economic Times. 2025. GOV Tracker: Zepto’s GOV Rising, Closing Gap to Rivals; Expansion in Tier-1/2 and Supply Chain Investment. May 26, 2025.

6. The Economic Times. 2025. Hyperlocal Warehousing Surge: Dark Stores Booming in Metro/Tier-2 Cities to Support 10–15 Min Delivery Demand. May Week of June 2025.

7. Financial Times. 2025. Profitability Challenges: Revenue Jumped 64% for Key Players; Losses Doubled/Slumped; High Infrastructure Cost; Delivery Fees Still Low Despite Required Scale Economics. May 16, 2025.

8. India Retailing. 2024. Quick Commerce Redefining Shopping: Market $6.1 Billion in 2024, Projected $40 Billion by 2030 (CAGR 48%); 46% Consumers Shift from Kiranas; Average Order ₹300–660; 75% Unplanned Purchases. November 22, 2024.

9. Inc42. 2025. Zepto’s 2024 Review: TAM ~US $45 Billion; Blinkit 46%, Zepto 29%, Instamart 24%; Competition Intensifying. 2025.

10. “Majority of Zepto’s Dark Stores Operationally Profitable Now: Co-Founder.” 2023. The Economic Times. 2023.

11. Moneycontrol. 2024. FY24 Results: Revenue ₹4,455 Crore (+120%), Expenses ₹5,747 Crore (+72%), Losses Marginally Reduced to ₹1,249 Crore; PAT Improved from –63% to –28%; Cash Burn ₹250–300 Crore/Month; Preparing IPO with Banks Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Axis; Cash Balance ~₹692 Crore by FY End. December 13, 2024.

12. Nextsprints Team. 2024. Zepto Quick Commerce Strategy Guide: Hyperlocal Dark Stores (500+) for 10-Min Delivery in 50+ Cities; AI Inventory; EV Fleet; 99.5% Fulfillment; Carbon Emissions Cut 50%; Strategic Expansion with 70% YoY Growth. June 18, 2024.

13. Raghunathan, A. 2024. “How Delivery App Zepto Plans to Take Bigger Bite of Quick Commerce Market in India.” Forbes India, June 2, 2024.

14. Reuters/AICPDF. 2025. Quick Commerce Categorized under Predatory Pricing; Blinkit~40%, Zepto ~29%, Instamart ~26% Market Share. March 6, 2025.

15. “The Story Behind Swiggy.” n.d. CIIM – Chandigarh Institute of Internet Marketing. https://www.ciim.in/tag/the-story-behind-swiggy/.

16. Swiggy. 2020. Wikipedia. Last modified October 3, 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Swiggy.

17. TVS Capital Fund. 2025. Unsustainable Boom: Quick Commerce Projected $6 Billion Sales by 2024; Deemed a “Passing Fad”; Reliant on VC/Follow-on Funding. February 13, 2025.

18. Wikipedia. 2025. “Zepto.” Last modified June 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zepto.

19. “Zepto Success Story – Delivering Groceries in 10 Mins.” 2022. StartupTalky. 2022.