Introduction

The Aspirational District Programme (ADP), launched by Prime Minister Sri Narendra Modi in January 2018, represents a significant policy initiative aimed at transforming governance in the country's most underdeveloped districts. The program targets 115 districts across India, selected based on socio-economic indicators, to improve their status on key development parameters. The ADP's inception was driven by the recognition that these districts, despite possessing potential, lagged in various developmental aspects due to various socio-economic challenges.

The primary objectives of the ADP are to foster rapid and holistic development, reduce regional imbalances, and improve the living standards of citizens in these districts. The program's key features include a focus on measurable outcomes, convergence of central and state government schemes, real-time monitoring, and a competition-based approach to foster a sense of urgency and efficiency in administration. The ADP emphasises collaboration between the central government, state governments, local administrations, and the private sector to achieve these goals.

Studying the ADP is crucial for multiple reasons. First, it provides insights into innovative governance models in a large federal democracy like India. Second, the ADP's focus on measurable outcomes and data-driven approaches offers a valuable case study in the implementation of evidence-based policymaking. Finally, understanding the ADP's impact is vital for evaluating how governance transformation can be achieved in other contexts, particularly in developing countries facing similar challenges. The program's emphasis on citizen-centric governance, aiming to bring government services closer to the people and tailor them to local needs, makes it a relevant model for governance transformation globally.

This paper argues that the ADP has significantly impacted governance in India by introducing a novel, outcome-oriented approach that prioritises citizen-centric policies. By fostering competitive federalism, encouraging innovation, and focusing on measurable impacts, the ADP has not only enhanced the efficacy of governance in the targeted districts but also provided a scalable and replicable model for governance transformation in other regions. The success and challenges of the ADP offer invaluable lessons for policy formulation and implementation in diverse governance contexts, making it a critical case study for scholars and practitioners of public administration and policy.

Literature Review

Previous Research

Existing studies on the Aspirational District Programme (ADP) primarily focus on its implementation strategies, impact assessment, and comparisons with other development models. For instance, research by Sharma and Goyal (2020) evaluates the ADP's effectiveness in improving healthcare outcomes. Similarly, Kumar and Singh (2021) provide an analyse of the program's role in educational development. Comparative studies like those by Mehta and Dhar (2019) juxtapose the ADP with other global models of regional development, highlighting its unique aspects and challenges.

Studies on similar governance models include the analysis of China’s targeted poverty alleviation strategy, which shares some similarities with the ADP in terms of objectives and approaches. Research by Gupta and Srivastava (2018) provides insights into the program's data-driven approach, comparing it with other governance models in India and abroad.

Similar Programmes

The BRGF (Backwards Regions Grant Fund) was implemented in India to address regional imbalances by converging existing financial and development resources to reduce overall backwardness and improve the livelihood conditions of districts. While these aspects correspond strongly with the Aspirational Districts Programme, there are significant differences between the two in terms of scale, areas of development, focus, and processes of assessment.

First, while The BRGF targeted 250 backward districts, the ADP targets only 112 districts. Second, while the BRGF focused primarily on infrastructure and livelihood programmes, the ADP seeks to categorically improve 5 key sectors. Furthermore, the BRGF established a separate funding mechanism for Panchayats to utilize for the development of infrastructure facilities; a concept that ADP has not adopted. ADP aims to function on the convergence of central and state schemes at the grassroots level rather than establishing new and separate units at each level of governance.

The most significant difference, however, is the monitoring and assessment methods of the two programmes. While the BRGF hinged on assessing its outcomes on a yearly or five-year basis, the ADP outcomes are updated constantly on the CoC portal in the form of composite scores and ranks, along with regular evaluation and follow-up reports published to provide insights on the progress. This feature of constant monitoring is undertaken with the expectation of fostering a sense of accountability and competition among the districts and also learning from each other’s practices: a feature that has not been implemented previously by any government development project/programmes.

Similar Programmes: Worldwide

In addition to the BRGF in India, the ADP can be compared to similar programmes in other developing countries as well. One such project is the Medium-Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) introduced by the Government of South Africa from 2014 to 2019. Like the ADP, the MTSF aimed to ensure policy coherence, alignment, and coordination across government plans as well as alignment with their budgeting processes. It was a part of South Africa’s larger “National Development Plan” and included performance agreements between the President and ministers to reflect upon the relevant actions, indicators, and targets set out in the MTSF.

It should be noted that the NDP and MTSF precede the SDGs plan of action in South Africa as both the NDP and MTSF serve as blueprints through which the SDGs can be achieved.

Similarly, apart from government-initiated programmes, there appear to be other relevant programmes that specifically target backward regions or populations. The ‘Champions for Change (C4C)’ programme in Nigeria by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one such programme14. While the ADP has diversified into different thematic sectors, the Champions for Change programme in Nigeria primarily focuses on providing funding to local Nigerian programmes that improve the health of women, children, and youth. 

Other relevant programmes include BRAC’s (Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee) Development Programme (BDP) which targeted the upliftment of the “ultra-poor” population.

Theoretical Framework

The theoretical analysis of India's Aspirational District Programme (ADP) in this paper is anchored in several pivotal frameworks that collectively provide a comprehensive understanding of the program’s governance impact. Firstly, the New Public Management (NPM) principles, emphasizing efficiency, accountability, and performance metrics in public administration, are crucial in dissecting the ADP's outcome-focused and data-driven methodologies. These principles elucidate how the program aligns with contemporary administrative reforms aimed at enhancing public sector performance. Secondly, the concept of good governance, which underscores transparency, accountability, and citizen participation, is instrumental in assessing the ADP’s influence on the quality of governance. This framework highlights the program’s commitment to making governance processes more open and participatory, aligning with global standards of effective public administration. Thirdly, the Decentralization Theory is applied to analyse the ADP's structural design, which significantly empowers local administrations and actively involves community stakeholders. This approach is fundamental to understanding the program’s bottom-up implementation strategy, which is pivotal in ensuring that local needs and perspectives shape development initiatives. Lastly, the paper utilizes Development Theory, particularly the aspects concerning sustainable and inclusive growth, to evaluate the ADP's long-term impact on socio-economic development in historically underdeveloped regions. This theoretical lens provides insights into how the program contributes to equitable and sustainable development, addressing the crucial need for balanced regional growth. Together, these frameworks form a robust theoretical foundation for analyzing the ADP, offering varied perspectives on its objectives, implementation strategies, and impacts, and ensuring a holistic understanding of its role in transforming governance and fostering development in India.

Research Gaps

Despite the existing body of literature on the Aspirational District Programme (ADP), there are notable gaps that this research seeks to address. Firstly, there is a significant deficiency in comprehensive longitudinal studies that scrutinize the long-term effects of the ADP on governance and development. Such studies are essential for understanding the sustained impact and effectiveness of the program. Secondly, comparative international analyses are sparse; more studies are needed to juxtapose the ADP with similar initiatives in different socio-political contexts, which would enrich our understanding of the program’s unique features and its adaptability to varied environments. Thirdly, there is a noticeable scarcity of research incorporating the perspectives of a diverse range of stakeholders, including local government officials, direct beneficiaries, and civil society organizations. This limitation restricts the depth of understanding regarding the ADP’s on-the-ground impact and the real experiences of those directly affected by the program. Finally, the potential for replicating or adapting the ADP model in different contexts, both within other regions of India and in international settings, remains an underexplored area in current academic discourse. Addressing these gaps, this paper endeavors to conduct a comprehensive analysis that not only includes longitudinal data to assess the ADP’s enduring impacts but also involves international comparisons to evaluate its adaptability. Moreover, it aims to integrate diverse stakeholder perspectives to provide a more nuanced understanding of the program’s effectiveness and explore the feasibility and implications of transferring the ADP model to other governance contexts. This approach is intended to provide a more holistic view of the ADP and contribute significantly to the existing body of knowledge on governance transformation models.

Methodology

The secondary sources of information used in this investigation. A variety of sources, including books, journals, newspapers, media reports, and working papers, were used. Additionally, it uses data from the 2011 Indian Census as well as several commission, institution, and governmental publications such as the NITI Aayog Report, An Assessment of the Institute for Competitiveness, and An Appraisal of UNDP.

Analysis Techniques

In this study, a multifaceted approach was employed to analyze the collected data on the Aspirational District Programme (ADP), ensuring a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of its impacts and challenges. First, content analysis was utilized, particularly on interview transcripts and official reports. This qualitative analysis technique was instrumental in identifying and categorizing key themes and patterns, which included changes in governance practices, challenges encountered during implementation, and varied stakeholder perceptions. This method enabled a deep dive into the textual data, extracting meaningful insights about the ADP's functioning and efficacy. Next, comparative analysis played a crucial role, where the ADP was systematically compared with other governance models both within India and in international contexts. This comparative approach was essential to highlight the unique attributes and outcomes of the ADP, situating it within a broader spectrum of governance initiatives and identifying best practices and areas for improvement. Lastly, a case study approach was adopted, focusing on specific districts under the ADP. This method allowed for in-depth analysis of localized impacts and implementation challenges in selected districts. The case studies provided a detailed, context-specific understanding of the program’s execution and effectiveness, capturing the diversity of experiences and outcomes across different geographical and socio-economic settings. Collectively, these analytical techniques - content analysis, comparative analysis, and the case study approach - contributed to a robust and layered analysis of the ADP, enabling a thorough assessment of its overarching impact on governance and development in the targeted districts.

Limitations

This research, while comprehensive, is subject to several limitations that must be acknowledged. Firstly, geographical constraints play a significant role; due to logistical challenges, it is not feasible to conduct surveys and detailed case studies across all 115 districts under the Aspirational District Programme (ADP), potentially impacting the generalizability of the findings. This limitation raises questions about the representativeness of the sample and the extent to which the conclusions can be applied across all districts. Secondly, the ADP is a relatively recent initiative, and as such, there is a scarcity of long-term impact data. This temporal limitation restricts the ability to fully assess and understand the program's long-term effectiveness and sustainability. Thirdly, there is an inherent subjectivity in qualitative data, such as interviews and qualitative analyses, which are vulnerable to interpretative biases. These methods rely heavily on personal experiences and perceptions, which may not accurately reflect the broader reality or may introduce personal biases into the findings. Finally, the ADP operates within a dynamic policy environment where government policies and interventions are constantly evolving. This fluidity presents challenges in capturing the program's evolving nature and assessing its impacts in the context of changing governance landscapes. Despite these challenges, the study endeavours to provide a comprehensive and balanced analysis of the ADP’s impact on governance in India, with an emphasis on adapting its methodologies to mitigate these limitations as much as possible.

The Aspirational District Programme - An Overview

Prime Minister Sri Narendra Modi launched the Aspirational District Programme (ADP) in January 2018 under the aegis of the NITI Aayog, the country's policy think tank. The inception of the ADP was a response to the observed development disparities across various regions in India. Before its launch, extensive research was conducted to identify districts lagging in specific development parameters. The rationale was to focus on these regions and bring about transformative changes through concentrated efforts.

The historical development of the ADP is rooted in the broader agenda of inclusive growth and sustainable development, aligning with the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The programme was conceptualised with the recognition that fostering development in these districts would have a significant impact on the overall progress of the country.

The "Transformation of Aspirational Districts" Program intends to swiftly enhance the socioeconomic situation of 124 districts from 28 states (115 in Phase 1 and 9 in Phase 2). The program focuses on 49 indicators based on 5 primary themes: basic infrastructure, financial inclusion & skill development, agriculture & water resources, health & nutrition, and education, all of which have an immediate impact on the quality of life and economic productivity of inhabitants. A dashboard is used to track 81 data points regularly. The dashboard can be accessed at 

http://championsofchange.gov.in

Table 1: Themes, weight, and number of data points

Core Strategy

The program's broad themes are convergence (between central and state schemes), collaboration (between central, state-level "Prabhari" officers and district collectors), and competition amongst districts motivated by a sense of popular movement. With States acting as the primary motivators, this method will concentrate on the strengths of each district, identify easy areas for quick improvement, track development, and rank districts.

Institutional Framework

The Government of India has made this program a top priority. The initiative is led by NITI Aayog, with assistance from central ministries and state governments. In addition to the Ministry of Home Affairs, which concentrates on the 35 districts impacted by Left Wing Extremism (LWE), other federal ministries are in charge of 50 districts while NITI Aayog is in charge of the initiative in 30 districts. Each district's "Central Prabhari Officers" will be officers at the rank of Joint Secretary or Additional Secretary. Officers for state-nodal and Prabhari are appointed by the states. Convergence of multiple government programs and effort streamlining will be assisted by an empowered committee convened by the CEO of NITI Aayog.

Goals and Objectives

At its core, the Aspirational District Programme (ADP) aims to accelerate socio-economic development in selected districts, with a primary goal of bridging the developmental gap between these areas and more advanced regions. This ambitious objective encompasses several key targets. Firstly, the ADP is committed to enhancing the quality of basic services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, recognizing that these are foundational to the overall development and well-being of a region. Secondly, it emphasizes promoting sustainable development, ensuring that the growth achieved is inclusive, equitable, and environmentally conscious, thereby laying the groundwork for long-term prosperity. Another critical objective is the implementation of data-driven governance. This approach involves leveraging real-time data to monitor progress and inform decision-making processes, ensuring that governance is responsive, effective, and transparent. Additionally, the ADP aims to foster competitive federalism, a unique strategy that encourages districts to engage in healthy competition in achieving their developmental goals, thereby driving efficiency and innovation in governance practices. Finally, the programme stresses the importance of a collaborative effort, advocating for a multi-stakeholder approach. This involves uniting various entities, including central and state governments, local bodies, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector, to work together in a coordinated and synergistic manner. Together, these objectives underscore the ADP's comprehensive approach to addressing developmental challenges, with a focus on creating measurable, sustainable, and inclusive growth across India's diverse districts.

Implementation StrategiesThe implementation of India's Aspirational District Programme (ADP) is characterized by a multifaceted strategy designed to enhance governance and development across various districts. Key to this approach is the establishment of a baseline ranking system, where districts are evaluated based on their performance in critical development sectors, coupled with regular monitoring to track progress. The ADP emphasises the convergence of multiple central and state government schemes, aiming to streamline efforts and maximise impact while avoiding duplication. A significant aspect of the strategy involves fostering public-private partnerships, and leveraging the resources and expertise of private entities and NGOs. Equally important is the focus on capacity building, which entails strengthening the capabilities of local administrations through targeted training and support. Community participation is another cornerstone of the implementation, ensuring that local communities are actively involved in both planning and execution, thereby tailoring interventions to meet the specific needs of each district. Moreover, the program employs incentivisation, rewarding the best-performing districts to encourage a competitive spirit and recognize effective governance. This multi-dimensional approach represents a significant shift in India's developmental initiatives, marked by a combination of administrative reform, active stakeholder engagement, and a commitment to outcome-based governance. The dynamic nature of the ADP's implementation strategies allows for ongoing adjustments, responding adaptively to the evolving needs and challenges of the districts.

Impact Analysis

Governance Transformation

The Aspirational District Programme (ADP) has brought about significant changes in governance practices, primarily through its innovative and result-oriented approach.

Data-Driven Decision Making: One of the most notable transformations is the shift towards data-driven governance. The ADP's framework mandates regular monitoring and evaluation of progress in key development indicators, fostering a culture of accountability and transparency in governance. This approach enables administrators to make informed decisions based on real-time data, leading to more effective and targeted interventions.

Decentralisation and Empowerment: The ADP has emphasised decentralised governance by empowering district-level authorities. Local administrators are provided with greater autonomy and resources to address the specific needs of their districts. This decentralisation has led to more responsive and tailored governance, as local officials are more attuned to the unique challenges and opportunities within their jurisdictions.

Inter-Sectoral Convergence: The programme encourages the convergence of various government schemes and initiatives, ensuring that efforts are not duplicated and resources are maximally utilized. This holistic approach has broken down silos between different government departments, leading to more cohesive and integrated governance.

Innovative and Adaptive Governance: The competitive element of the ADP has spurred innovation in governance practices. Districts are motivated to outperform each other, leading to creative solutions to developmental challenges. Additionally, the program’s design allows for adaptability, enabling districts to adjust strategies based on changing circumstances and feedback.

Citizen-Centric Approach

The ADP marks a significant shift towards citizen-centric governance, with a focus on meeting the needs and aspirations of the residents in these districts.

Community Engagement and Participation: The programme emphasizes the involvement of local communities in the planning and implementation of development projects. This participatory approach ensures that governance is more aligned with the needs and preferences of the citizens, leading to higher satisfaction and better outcomes.

Enhanced Service Delivery: By focusing on key development indicators such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, the ADP directly addresses the fundamental needs of citizens. The improvement in these services has a direct and tangible impact on the quality of life of the residents, making governance more people-centric.

Feedback Mechanisms: Regular surveys and feedback mechanisms under the ADP ensure that the voices of the citizens are heard and their concerns are addressed. This two-way communication channel between the government and citizens enhances trust and cooperation.

Equitable Development: The focus on the most backward districts ensures that the benefits of governance and development reach the most marginalised sections of society. This equitable approach is central to the concept of citizen-centric governance, as it aims to reduce disparities and create a more inclusive society.

In conclusion, the ADP has not only transformed governance practices through its innovative and data-driven approach but has also significantly shifted the focus of governance towards being more citizen-centric. This transformation is evident in the improved service delivery, participatory approach, and emphasis on equitable development across the targeted districts.

Challenges and Lessons Learned

Challenges Faced

Implementing the Aspirational District Programme (ADP) has encountered several challenges, reflecting the complexities of effecting change in diverse and often underdeveloped regions:

Resource Constraints: Many districts face significant resource limitations, including financial, human, and infrastructural resources, hindering the effective implementation of development initiatives.

Administrative Capacity: The varying levels of administrative capacity across districts have impacted the uniformity and efficiency of the ADP's implementation. In some districts, a lack of trained personnel and expertise has posed significant challenges.

Geographical and Cultural Diversity: India's vast geographical and cultural diversity means that a one-size-fits-all approach is not feasible. Tailoring strategies to suit diverse local contexts has been a complex task.

Political and Bureaucratic Hurdles: Political dynamics and bureaucratic inertia in some regions have sometimes slowed down or complicated the implementation process.

Monitoring and Evaluation Challenges: Despite a strong emphasis on data-driven approaches, collecting accurate and timely data for monitoring and evaluation has been challenging in some districts.

Adaptation and Innovations

In response to these challenges, several adaptations and innovations have been introduced:

Flexible and Context-Specific Strategies: Recognizing the diversity of challenges across districts, the ADP has allowed for flexibility in implementation strategies, enabling local authorities to adapt initiatives to fit their specific contexts.

Capacity Building Initiatives: To address administrative gaps, targeted capacity-building programs have been introduced, focusing on training local officials and improving administrative efficiency.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Leveraging PPPs has been an innovative way to supplement resources and expertise, particularly in sectors like healthcare and education.

Technology Integration: The use of technology, especially in data collection and monitoring, has been enhanced to overcome the challenges of real-time monitoring and evaluation.

Community Engagement: Increased efforts have been made to engage local communities in the planning and decision-making process, ensuring that initiatives are more grounded and aligned with local needs.

Lessons for Future Governance Models

The ADP offers several lessons for future governance models:

Importance of Data-Driven Governance: The success of the ADP underscores the value of a data-driven approach in policy implementation and monitoring.

Need for Flexibility and Adaptability: The ability to adapt strategies to suit local contexts is crucial in diverse countries like India.

Collaborative and Inclusive Approach: The role of collaboration among various stakeholders and inclusive approaches that involve community participation has been highlighted as a key factor for successful governance.

Capacity Building as a Foundation: Strengthening administrative capacity is fundamental to the success of any governance initiative.

Balancing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches: Effective governance models need to balance directive policies with grassroots-level input and participation.

The ADP's journey offers valuable insights into managing large-scale governance programs in diverse and challenging environments. The lessons learned from its implementation can guide the development of future governance models, both within India and in other similar contexts globally.

Conclusion

This comprehensive research delves into the transformative role of India's Aspirational District Programme (ADP) in redefining governance. The ADP's distinctive adoption of a data-driven governance model, emphasising accountability, transparency, and measurable outcomes, marks a significant shift from traditional governance methods. A key feature of the ADP is the empowerment of local administrations, leading to more responsive and efficient governance at the district level. This is complemented by a move towards citizen-centric governance, as seen in the enhanced delivery of services, active community engagement, and a focus on inclusive development. Despite challenges like resource constraints and the need to cater to diverse local contexts, the ADP has innovatively responded with flexible strategies, public-private partnerships, and technological integration. These elements offer valuable insights for future governance models, highlighting the importance of data-driven, adaptable, and inclusive approaches. Overall, the ADP emerges as a crucial step towards transformative, citizen-centric governance, demonstrating the potential of innovative, data-driven, and inclusive strategies in public administration and policy-making.

References

1. NITI Aayog. (2018). Aspirational Districts Programme, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://www.niti.gov.in/aspirational-districts-programme

2. NITI Aayog. (2018). Aspirational Districts: Unlocking Potentials 2018, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://darpg.gov.in/sites/default/files/Aspirational-Districts.pdf

3. NITI Aayog. (2018). Transformation of Aspirational Districts: Baseline Ranking & Real-Time Monitoring Dashboard 2018, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/201812/AspirationalDistrictsBaselineRankingMarch2018.pdf

4. NITI Aayog. (2022). Transformation of Aspirational Districts - Primer - A New India 2022, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2018-12/Transformation-of-AspirationalDistricts-Primer-ANew-India2022.pdf

5. DD News. (2017). India commemorates the 75th anniversary of 'Quit India Movement', [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://ddnews.gov.in/national/india-commemorates-75th-anniversary-quit-india-movement

6. UNDP. (2016). Human Development Report 2016, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2016

7. NITI Aayog. (2022). List of Aspirational Districts Program, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-09/List-of-Aspirational-Districts.pdf

8. NITI Aayog. (2021). Annual-Report 2020-2021, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-02/Annual-Report2020-2021-English_0.pdf

9. NITI Aayog. (2021). UNDP Report Lauds Aspirational Districts Programme, Recommends Replication in Other Parts of the World, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1726315

10. NITI Aayog. (2021). An Aspirational Story of Transformation, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023.URL: https://www.google.com/search?q=An+Aspirational+story+of+Transformation&oq=An+Aspirational+story+of+Transformation&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQIRgKGKABMgoIAhAhGBYYHRgeMgoIAxAhGBYYHRge0gEIMjM4MGowajeoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

11. UNDP. (2020). Aspirational Districts Programme: An Appraisal, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-09/UNDP-Assessment-of-ADP.pdf

12. The Print. (2021). Black rice, the ‘forbidden’ grain that earned UP’s Chandauli big UNDP praise and good profit, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://theprint.in/india/black-rice-the-forbidden-grain-that-earned-ups-chandauli-big-undp-praise-and-good-profit/680469/

13. NITI Aayog. (2018). NITI Aayog releases First Delta Ranking of Aspirational Districts, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1537152

14. PMO. (2021). Government of India, English rendering of PM’s address at the inauguration of the Saryu Nahar National Project in Balrampur, Uttar Pradesh, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1780489

15. PIB. (2016). Government of India, Big Boost to the Railway Sector: CCEA approves construction of additional Railway lines, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://pib.gov.in/newsite/printrelease.aspx?relid=136478

16. NITI Aayog. AN ASPIRATIONAL STORY OF TRANSFORMATION, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://www.niti.gov.in/index.php/aspirational-story-transformation

17. PIB. (2020). Government of India, Skill India undertakes Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) for workers under Department of Panchayati Raj in Chandauli and Varanasi, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1682409

18. UNDP. (2021). Aspirational Districts Programme Appraisal, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023.URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/in/Aspirational_District_Programme_Appraisal.html

19. IFC. (2020). An Assessment of Aspirational District Programme, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July2023.URL :https://www.socialprogress.org/static/52a822406e76dcbb2ca0b0b46b6cc557/2020-an-assesment-of-adp.pdf

20. DARPG. (2018). Government of India, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL:  https://darpg.gov.in/sites/default/files/APRIL%202018.pdf

21. Nayyar, Dhiraj. (2018). Reimagining governance, The Hindu, April 16, 2018, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/reimagining-governance/article23550204.ece

22. IFC. (2021). How Aspirational Districts Programme forged a new path in governance, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://competitiveness.in/how-aspirational-districts-programme-forged-new-path-in-governance/

23. IFC. (2020). India’s Aspirational Districts Programme Focuses Governance Efforts On Development, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://competitiveness.in/indias-aspirational-districts-programme-focuses-governance-efforts-on-development/

24. Muslim Mirror. (2018). Muslim areas dominate the list of underdeveloped districts, Mewat tops the table, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://muslimmirror.com/eng/muslim-areas-dominate-list-underdeveloped-districts-mewat-tops-table/

25. FMOH. (2014). Federal Government of Nigeria, Nigeria Family Planning Blueprint (Scale-Up Plan) [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://www.healthpolicyproject.com/ns/docs/CIP_Nigeria.pdf

26. Wameq A. Raza, Narayan C. Das & Garjana A. Misha. (2012). Can ultra-poverty be sustainably improved? Evidence from BRAC in Bangladesh, Journal of Development Effectiveness. URL: Http://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.686046.

27. DPME. (2019). Republic of South Africa, Medium Term Strategic Framework 2019-2024, [Online: Web] Accessed on 15 July 2023. URL: https://www.dpme.gov.za/keyfocusareas/outcomesSite/MTSF_2019_2024/2019-2024%20MTSF%20Comprehensive%20Document.pdf