Abstract

Rapid rural transformation is crucial for achieving equitable and sustainable development, particularly in countries like India, where rural areas comprise nearly 65% of the population and form the backbone of the national economy. This paper examines the imperative of developing smart rural infrastructure by integrating principles of utility, resilience, and sustainability. Drawing on comparative international experiences such as the European Union’s Smart Villages initiative, China’s Digital Villages strategy, and decentralized off-grid systems in Sub-Saharan Africa it contextualizes India’s policy landscape, highlighting major flagship schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, the Jal Jeevan Mission, and BharatNet. The analysis identifies key policy gaps, including fragmented planning, inadequate operation and maintenance funding, limited climate adaptation measures, and persistent digital divides. In response, the paper proposes an integrated framework that emphasizes convergence across sectors, community driven governance, climate-resilient design standards, and enhanced digital capacity at the grassroots level. By synthesizing global lessons with India’s evolving institutional context, the paper contributes to the discourse on rural infrastructure as a driver of inclusive growth and climate resilience, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals and India’s vision for Atmanirbhar Bharat. The study offers actionable insights for policymakers, development practitioners, and local governance institutions engaged in rural transformation.

Keywords: Smart Villages, Rural Infrastructure, Climate Resilience, Sustainable Development, India

Introduction

Globally, the concept of smart rural infrastructure is gaining traction as a practical means to bridge the growing urban–rural development divide. The term refers to integrated physical and digital infrastructure systems that enable efficient delivery of essential services such as water supply, roads, energy, sanitation, housing, and broadband connectivity while ensuring resilience to climate risks and long-term sustainability (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], 2020). According to the United Nations (2021), more than 43% of the global population resides in rural areas, and these communities often lack equitable access to infrastructure that supports livelihoods, health, and education.

International evidence shows that when rural infrastructure is smartly designed, it not only improves utility but also helps communities withstand environmental and economic shocks. For example, the European Union’s Smart Villages initiative promotes digital and social innovation in rural settlements to counter depopulation, economic stagnation, and service gaps (ENRD, 2018). Likewise, China’s investments in rural smart grids and digital connectivity have contributed to significant poverty alleviation outcomes (Zhou et al., 2020). However, challenges remain, such as ensuring affordability, interoperability, and community ownership of these systems (Li et al., 2022).

In India, the stakes are arguably even higher. Nearly 65% of India’s population about 900 million people still live in rural areas (Ministry of Rural Development, 2023). While significant progress has been made in rural roads (PMGSY has built over 700,000 km of roads since 2000) and electrification (village electrification reached nearly 100% by 2019), service quality, maintenance, and climate resilience continue to pose challenges (Asian Development Bank, 2022; NITI Aayog, 2021). According to the India Infrastructure Report (IDFC Institute, 2022), approximately 55% of rural households lack reliable access to a piped water supply, and more than 50% lack internet connectivity.

Moreover, climate change amplifies infrastructure vulnerabilities. The World Bank (2021) estimates that climate change may push over 45 million South Asians into poverty by 2030 unless adaptive infrastructure systems are prioritized. In India, the National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP) and the National Rural Infrastructure Development Agency (NRIDA) are increasingly focusing on integrating sustainability and resilience into rural roads, irrigation systems, and housing. Similarly, the Jal Jeevan Mission and the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Gramin) stress decentralization and community-based models to ensure sustainability (MoJS, 2022).

The policy discourse is evolving towards an innovative smart village framework, which includes digital tools, decentralized renewable energy, smart grids, e-governance platforms, and climate-resilient construction technologies (Kumar et al., 2021). Nevertheless, operationalizing this vision requires the convergence of sectoral schemes, capacity building for local governments, and access to finance.

To align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) especially SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) India must ensure that rural infrastructure is not just expanded quantitatively but is designed for long-term utility, resilience, and sustainability (United Nations, 2021). As India works towards its Amrit Kaal vision for 2047, the focus on smart, inclusive, and climate-adaptive rural infrastructure will be pivotal to achieving equitable growth.

This paper examines how India can enhance its rural infrastructure framework by leveraging global best practices and local innovations. By contextualizing India’s initiatives within a comparative international framework, it aims to inform policymakers, practitioners, and local governance institutions on pathways to scale smart, inclusive, and climate-resilient rural infrastructure systems. It situates India’s rural infrastructure trajectory within a global perspective, drawing empirical lessons from the European Union’s Smart Villages framework, China’s Digital Villages strategy, and decentralized off-grid models in Sub-Saharan Africa. The paper then critically analyses the current status, implementation gaps, and policy challenges associated with India’s key rural infrastructure sectors, including rural roads, safe drinking water, digital connectivity, and climate adaptation. Based on this synthesis, it offers evidence-informed recommendations for designing and operationalizing systems that are utility-driven, climate-resilient, and socially sustainable. Its principal contribution lies in bridging international insights with India’s evolving institutional frameworks, providing an integrated roadmap for transformative and equitable rural development.

Flagship Schemes and Smart Rural Infrastructure: India’s Strategic Approach

In India, rural infrastructure development has been a central policy priority since independence, with significant progress achieved through various flagship schemes. The country’s strategic push to transform its rural landscape focuses on providing last-mile connectivity, reliable basic services, and a foundation for sustainable economic growth. Unlike earlier piecemeal interventions, the contemporary approach integrates traditional rural development programmes with smart technologies, community-based governance, and climate-resilient designs.

Rural Roads and Connectivity: PMGSY

The Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY), launched in 2000, has been instrumental in connecting over 97% of India’s eligible habitations with all-weather roads (Ministry of Rural Development, 2023). As of March 2023, more than 724,000 km of rural roads have been constructed, significantly boosting rural mobility, farm-to-market linkages, and access to health and education (NITI Aayog, 2021).

Under the National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP), road infrastructure remains a top priority, with rural roads receiving continued allocations alongside expressways and national highways. According to the Ministry of Finance (2023), total investments planned for road infrastructure under the NIP until FY2025 amount to nearly ₹20 lakh crore, of which rural roads constitute a significant share due to the commitment to Universal Rural Connectivity. PMGSY-III further emphasizes climate-resilient roads, integrating technologies like cold mix for bitumen and geospatial monitoring systems to ensure durability (MoRD, 2023).

Safe and Sustainable Drinking Water: Jal Jeevan Mission

India’s water supply infrastructure in rural areas has historically been fragmented and reliant on deep borewells, leading to unsustainable extraction and poor service quality. The Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM), launched in 2019, aims to provide Functional Household Tap Connections (FHTCs) to every rural household by 2024. As per the Ministry of Jal Shakti (2023), nearly 62% of rural households (about 123 million) have been covered under JJM as of March 2024, a remarkable jump from just 17% in 2019.

The Union Budget 2024–25 allocated ₹70,000 crore for JJM, highlighting its centrality to rural well-being and gender empowerment (Press Information Bureau, 2024). The programme’s emphasis on source sustainability, greywater management, and village-level Operation & Maintenance (O&M) models marks a shift towards resilient and sustainable water infrastructure (MoJS, 2023).

Digital Infrastructure: BharatNet and Beyond

Digital connectivity is widely recognized as a cornerstone of smart rural infrastructure. The BharatNet project, one of the world’s largest rural broadband initiatives, seeks to connect over 250,000 Gram Panchayats through high-speed optical fibre (Department of Telecommunications, 2023). As of early 2024, fibre has been laid in about 200,000 villages, with over 150,000 Gram Panchayats service-ready (TRAI, 2024).

The Union Budget 2024–25 allocated approximately ₹14,000 crore to expand the digital infrastructure backbone, with an additional focus on leveraging satellite broadband for remote regions. BharatNet’s integration with Common Service Centres (CSCs) and digital literacy initiatives under the Digital India framework aims to enable e-health, e-education, digital payments, and smart governance in villages (DoT, 2023).

Despite these advances, challenges persist, including last-mile Wi-Fi access, local entrepreneurship for operations and maintenance (O&M), and digital literacy among marginalized groups (Mehta et al., 2023). These gaps are increasingly being addressed through models like Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) and local cooperatives.

Cold Chain and Agri-Logistics: Critical for Utility and Sustainability

Agriculture remains the primary source of livelihood for over 50% of India’s rural population, yet post-harvest losses due to inadequate storage and cold chain infrastructure are estimated at ₹92,000 crore annually (ICRIER, 2021). The National Infrastructure Pipeline allocates substantial funding for agri-logistics, including integrated cold chains and modern packhouses.

The Union Budget 2024–25 announced an expansion of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Sampada Yojana (PMKSY) and the Agri-Infra Fund, with over ₹10,000 crore set aside for rural cold chains and value-added facilities (Ministry of Food Processing Industries, 2024). Smart cold chains, utilizing IoT-based monitoring for temperature and spoilage control, can significantly enhance farmers’ incomes and reduce food waste, aligning with both economic and environmental objectives (Kumar & Singh, 2022).

Emerging Smart Village Models: Integrated and Community-Driven

Beyond sectoral schemes, India’s policy discourse is increasingly gravitating towards integrated Smart Village models. States such as Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh have piloted ‘smart villages’ that converge investments in roads, drinking water, sanitation, solar micro-grids, digital services, and climate-resilient housing (Sharma & Kumar, 2022). These initiatives draw inspiration from international best practices, such as the EU’s Smart Villages concept, but are adapted to local socio-economic contexts.

The Smart Village approach typically emphasizes:

• Integrated planning at the Gram Panchayat level.

• Community participation and ownership.

• Digital tools for service delivery and governance.

• Renewable energy systems for decentralized supply.

• Resilient housing and WASH infrastructure to adapt to climate variability.

For instance, the Smart Gaon initiative in Uttar Pradesh combines Wi-Fi connectivity, digital classrooms, telemedicine, and solar-powered street lighting (SmartGaon Foundation, 2023). Meanwhile, the Government of India’s pilot on Model Villages under Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana (SAGY) provides a framework for scaling up integrated, smart interventions with clear sustainability metrics (NITI Aayog, 2023).

Towards a Convergent and Resilient Policy Ecosystem

The policy landscape is moving towards convergence and lifecycle planning. The National Infrastructure Pipeline, Jal Jeevan Mission, BharatNet, and PMGSY are increasingly coordinated through the Gram Panchayat Development Plans (GPDPs) under the Ministry of Panchayati Raj. This helps align investments with local needs while ensuring accountability (MoPR, 2023).

However, experts caution that hardware investments alone are insufficient without robust operations and maintenance (O&M) systems, community capacity building, and climate adaptation measures (World Bank, 2021). For example, rural roads built under the PMGSY now incorporate climate risk assessments and resilient design features, such as raised embankments and improved drainage, in flood-prone regions (ADB, 2022).

Global Case Studies: Smart Rural Infrastructure in Action

The European Union’s Smart Villages Initiative

One of the most prominent global examples is the European Union’s Smart Villages concept, which emerged as a response to rural depopulation and service decline in many EU member states. The EU Action Plan for Smart Villages defines them as communities that use innovative solutions both digital and social to improve their resilience, service delivery, and quality of life (ENRD, 2018).

For instance, in Finland, the village of Kangasniemi developed a digital co-working hub and e-health telemedicine services to address rural youth outmigration and limited healthcare access (OECD, 2020). Similarly, in the French Alps, the village of Les Orres has adopted smart energy grids, high-speed broadband, and smart innovative tourism solutions that not only reduce energy costs but also boost local employment (Dax et al., 2019).

According to the European Network for Rural Development (ENRD, 2018), more than 40 pilot Smart Village projects have demonstrated that when rural communities are empowered with digital tools, governance capacity, and local innovation ecosystems, they can attract investment, retain young people, and build resilience to climate change. The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and LEADER Programme provide dedicated funding streams to scale these approaches.

China: Digital Villages and Rural Smart Grids

China’s Digital Village Strategy (2021–2025) is another significant case. Over the past decade, China has prioritized smart grids, rural broadband, and e-commerce platforms to lift millions out of poverty (Li et al., 2022). The Taobao Villages model is a hallmark example: these are rural clusters where e-commerce penetration exceeds 10% of local households, allowing farmers and artisans to sell directly to urban markets via Alibaba’s platforms (Zhou et al., 2020).

By 2020, China had over 5,425 Taobao Villages, generating an estimated US$ 100 billion in online sales (AliResearch, 2021). In addition, the State Grid Corporation of China has rolled out smart meters and microgrids to improve energy efficiency and reliability in rural areas. The integration of renewable energy especially solar mini-grids has helped reduce carbon emissions and enhance resilience to power outages (Zhang & Long, 2021).

Research shows that rural households connected to broadband networks and smart energy systems in provinces like Zhejiang and Sichuan report a 15–25% increase in average household incomes compared to non-connected villages (Li et al., 2022). However, gaps remain in ensuring equal access for ethnic minorities and remote mountainous areas.

Africa: Off-Grid Renewables and Digital Inclusion

In Sub-Saharan Africa, where over 50% of rural populations lack access to reliable electricity (IEA, 2022), decentralized smart infrastructure is critical. Kenya’s M-KOPA model is widely cited as a best practice in last-mile energy access. It uses pay-as-you-go solar kits and IoT-enabled meters to provide affordable, reliable electricity to rural households (GSMA, 2021). By 2021, M-KOPA had connected over 1 million households, reducing kerosene usage and associated carbon emissions.

Similarly, Rwanda’s Smart Village Programme integrates off-grid renewable energy with digital platforms for e-health and agricultural extension. According to the World Bank (2021), Rwanda’s government has installed over 300 microgrids serving rural communities, often bundled with Wi-Fi hotspots and mobile money solutions to support local entrepreneurs.

A study by Ilskog and Kjellström (2021) found that decentralized, smart off-grid solutions have significantly improved women’s economic participation in East African communities by reducing time, poverty, and enabling micro-enterprises. However, sustainability challenges persist due to high upfront costs and limited local technical capacity.

Key Lessons for India

These global cases highlight three critical lessons for India’s smart rural infrastructure journey:

i. Integrated Design: Successful models converge multiple services including energy, broadband, mobility, health, and education rather than treating them in silos. India’s pilot Smart Village models must similarly integrate schemes such as BharatNet, PMGSY, and JJM into their local development plans.

ii. Local Innovation Ecosystems: Empowering Gram Panchayats and local entrepreneurs to co-create solutions is vital. Europe’s Smart Villages and China’s Taobao Villages show that bottom-up innovation, when supported by digital tools and micro-financing, drives sustainability.

iii. Resilience and Affordability: Smart systems must be designed for climate and economic resilience. Africa’s pay-as-you-go models and China’s smart grids demonstrate the role of flexible, decentralized technologies in making infrastructure accessible to the poorest households.

iv. As India moves towards its Amrit Kaal vision for 2047, adapting these lessons can ensure that rural infrastructure is not only expanded but also designed for long-term utility, resilience, and sustainability.

Policy Gaps and Challenges

While India’s efforts to develop smart rural infrastructure are commendable, significant gaps remain in policy design, implementation, and long-term sustainability.

Fragmentation and Lack of Convergence: Despite flagship schemes like PMGSY, BharatNet, and Jal Jeevan Mission making notable progress individually, the lack of systematic convergence at the local level often results in duplicative investments or service gaps (NITI Aayog, 2021). The Ministry of Panchayati Raj’s push for Gram Panchayat Development Plans (GPDPs) aims to align multiple schemes; however, capacity constraints limit their effectiveness in many states (MoPR, 2023).

Financing Constraints and Operation & Maintenance (O&M): A recurring challenge is the limited emphasis on life-cycle costing and sustainable O&M funding. For instance, a 2022 Asian Development Bank (ADB) report found that while rural roads under PMGSY are widely constructed, nearly 30% require major repairs within five years due to poor maintenance budgets and weak contractor’s directions & supervision (ADB, 2022). Similarly, the sustainability of tap water connections under JJM depends on village-level O&M structures, which are still nascent in many Gram Panchayats (MoJS, 2023).

Climate Resilience Deficits: Infrastructure assets are increasingly vulnerable to extreme weather events. According to the World Bank (2021), India faces estimated annual losses of US$ 5–6 billion from flood and cyclone damage to rural infrastructure. While PMGSY-III and the Jal Jeevan Mission guidelines now encourage climate-resilient designs, the scale of implementation is still limited (ADB, 2022). Small farmers, women, and marginalized groups are often the worst affected.

Digital Divide and Skills Gap: Although BharatNet has expanded broadband reach, the digital divide persists. A TRAI (2024) report shows that only 37% of rural households have a functional internet connection, and digital literacy remains low among women and elderly populations (Mehta et al., 2023). Without community training, e-governance and smart service delivery models may fail to achieve intended outcomes.

Recommendations: Towards Resilient, Utility-Oriented, and Sustainable Rural Infrastructure

Addressing these gaps calls for an integrated policy vision anchored in resilience, sustainability, and inclusive governance. Drawing from global best practices and India’s own pilots, the following policy measures are recommended:

Institutionalize Convergence through Local Plans: Building on the GPDP framework, all rural infrastructure investments roads, water supply, energy, and digital services should be systematically aligned through block and district-level Integrated Infrastructure Development Plans (IIDPs) (MoPR, 2023). This would help eliminate redundancies, pool funds, and leverage synergies between central and state schemes.

International Lesson: The EU’s LEADER programme and Smart Villages approach demonstrate the value of local action groups for planning and managing integrated rural projects (Dax et al., 2019).

Strengthen Climate Resilience Standards: The government should expand mandatory climate risk assessments and resilient design standards to all new rural infrastructure projects, not just select pilots. For roads, this could include flood-resistant embankments, bio-engineered slopes, and climate-resilient materials (ADB, 2022). For water supply, community-led watershed management can ensure the sustainability of sources (MoJS, 2023).

International Lesson: In Bangladesh and Vietnam, community-based climate-proofing of rural roads has resulted in a 25% reduction in asset losses (World Bank, 2021).

Prioritize Lifecycle Funding and O&M: To ensure assets remain functional, state governments should allocate dedicated budgets for O&M of rural roads, water supply, and digital infrastructure. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) and community co-financing models, such as the pay-as-you-go microgrids in Kenya, can improve financial sustainability (GSMA, 2021).

Build Rural Digital Capacity: Bridging the digital divide requires not just laying fibre but also promoting digital literacy, affordable devices, and local entrepreneurship. Community Wi-Fi, digital skilling centres, and incentives for rural tech startups should be scaled through BharatNet and the Digital India framework (TRAI, 2024; Mehta et al., 2023).

International Lesson: China’s Taobao Villages show how training rural youth and women to run e-commerce micro-enterprises can significantly boost local incomes (Zhou et al., 2020).

Monitor Outcomes, Not Just Outputs: Finally, shifting from mere asset creation to outcome-based monitoring is essential. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should track not just kilometres of roads or number of tap connections but also indicators such as service uptime, climate resilience, user satisfaction, and poverty impacts (NITI Aayog, 2021).

Conclusion: Pathway To Sdgs and Atmanirbhar Bharat

Building smart rural infrastructure that is utility-driven, resilient, and sustainable is pivotal for achieving India’s development goals and its vision for Amrit Kaal. As India strives towards SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), the policy shift must be from fragmented, short-term projects to integrated, lifecycle-based investments that empower rural communities to thrive in a changing climate and digital economy.

A convergence of lessons from the EU, China, and Africa makes it clear that local innovation, climate resilience, and community ownership are non-negotiable pillars for success. With systematic convergence, adequate financing, and a strong push for digital and climate readiness, India can ensure that its villages do not remain at the periphery but emerge as hubs of innovation and sustainability in the decades to come.

References 

1. AliResearch. (2021). Taobao Villages Report 2021. Alibaba Research Institute. Retrieved from https://www.aliresearch.com

2. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Climate-Resilient Rural Roads in India. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org

3. Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J., & Maye, D. (2019). The LEADER Programme 2007–2013: Enabling or Disabling Social Innovation and Neo-endogenous Development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417705947

4. Department of Telecommunications (DoT). (2023). BharatNet Status Report 2022-23. Ministry of Communications, Government of India. Retrieved from https://dot.gov.in

5. ENRD. (2018). Smart Villages: Revitalising Rural Services. European Network for Rural Development. Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu

6. GSMA. (2021). Mobile for Development Utilities Annual Report 2021. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment

7. ICRIER. (2021). Addressing Post-Harvest Losses in India: Role of Cold Chains. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. Retrieved from https://icrier.org

8. Ilskog, E., & Kjellström, B. (2021). Electrification in Rural Africa: Challenges and Opportunities for Women. Energy Research & Social Science, 79, 102172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102172

9. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). Africa Energy Outlook 2022. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org

10. Kumar, A., & Singh, P. (2022). Smart Cold Chain Logistics: An Enabler for India’s Agricultural Transformation. Journal of Rural Development, 41(3), 421–438.

11. Kumar, A., Singh, R. P., & Pandey, R. (2021). Smart Village Approach in India: A Framework for Sustainable Rural Development. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 935–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2182

12. Li, J., Wang, Y., & Tan, W. (2022). The Development of Smart Villages in China: Progress and Challenges. Journal of Rural Studies, 91, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.02.005

13. Mehta, A., Sharma, P., & Kumar, S. (2023). Digital Divide in Rural India: Status and Policy Implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 58(4), 32–39.

14. Ministry of Finance. (2023). National Infrastructure Pipeline: Status Update 2023. Government of India. Retrieved from https://www.finmin.nic.in

15. Ministry of Jal Shakti (MoJS). (2022). Annual Report 2021–22. Retrieved from https://jalshakti-ddws.gov.in

16. Ministry of Jal Shakti (MoJS). (2023). Jal Jeevan Mission Dashboard. Retrieved from https://jaljeevanmission.gov.in

17. Ministry of Panchayati Raj (MoPR). (2023). Gram Panchayat Development Planning Guidelines. Government of India. Retrieved from https://panchayat.gov.in

18. Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD). (2023). PMGSY Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://rural.nic.in

19. NITI Aayog. (2021). Investment Opportunities in India’s Infrastructure Sector. Retrieved from https://www.niti.gov.in

20. NITI Aayog. (2023). Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana: Status Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.niti.gov.in

21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Rural Well-being: Geography of Opportunities. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d25cef80-en

22. Press Information Bureau (PIB). (2024). Union Budget Highlights 2024–25. Government of India. Retrieved from https://pib.gov.in

23. Sharma, R., & Kumar, R. (2022). Smart Village Development in India: Lessons from State-Level Pilots. International Journal of Rural Management, 18(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052211057403

24. SmartGaon Foundation. (2023). SmartGaon Project Status Report. Retrieved from https://smartgaon.org

25. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). (2024). Telecom Sector Performance Indicators 2023. Retrieved from https://www.trai.gov.in

26. United Nations. (2021). World Social Report 2021: Reconsidering Rural Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from 

27. https://www.un.org/development/desa

28. World Bank. (2021). South Asia Climate Change Action Plan 2021–2025. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org

29. Zhang, X., & Long, R. (2021). Smart Grids for Rural Electrification: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 155, 112334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112334

30. Zhou, Y., Sun, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). The Progress of Poverty Alleviation through Rural Infrastructure in China. Habitat International, 100, 102194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102194